For some reason, the usage check tests are now very slow to run (perhaps because of all the operator definitions added to each one?), which needs further investigation.
This may seem like an odd change, but it simplifies the logic a lot. I kept having problems with passes not operating on externals (e.g. functions-to-procs, adding array sizes, constant folding in array dimensions) and adding a special case every time to also process the externals was getting silly.
Putting the externals in the AST therefore made sense, but I didn't want to just add dummy bodies as this would cause them to throw up errors (e.g. in the type-checking for functions). So I turned the bodies into a Maybe type, and that has worked out well.
I also stopped storing the formals in csExternals (since they are now in csNames, and the tree), which streamlined that nicely, and stopped me having to keep them up to date.
I changed a little bit of the code, but mainly the tests. Several of the remaining failures are actually real failures, so I need to dig through the rest carefully. A lot are failing because the C++ backend is broken.
This is mostly straightforward: modify the parser to allow direction
decorators in the right places, and extend the type checker to match.
There's some slight awkwardness in that some of the Types functions
have to perform the same checks as the type checker (e.g. directing a
non-channel), so I've tidied up their error messages a bit.
At the backend, I've just added a little pass to strip out all the
DirectedVariables, since the other backend passes don't handle them
gracefully. From the occam/C point of view this is fine, but I'm not
sure if it's going to cause problems for C++.
This fixes the AST, parser and typechecker, and adds a pass to
transform Result back into Abbrev, but doesn't transform Initial yet.
(It actually works for trivial stuff anyway, but it won't do the right
thing for complex types or PROC parameters.)
It appears (to me) to make sense to support INITIAL/RESULT reshaping
and retyping too, so this does.
Refs #42.
All the passes now have their information (name, pre-requisites and post- properties) stored at the point where the pass is declared, which means the pass lists are just a simple list of pass functions.
The main consequence of this change was that the tests had to be changed. Now, instead of taking a "pass applied to data" item (type: PassM b), they take both the pass (type: Pass) and source data (type: b), and apply them later. This was the decision that involved the simplest changes to the existing tests (simply unbracketing the application of the pass to the source). I also had to include a few old-style versions though (testPass', testPassShouldFail') for where the functions were being used to test things that weren't actually passes (mainly StructureOccam).
Fixes#48
This makes it possible to mark a slice as not needing runtime
checking, which is immediately useful for _sizes arrays.
This fixes cgtest03, which was previously failing to compile because
the _sizes array for one of the constants in it contained a runtime
check and thus wasn't itself constant. I've added a testcase file for
the relevant bit of code.
It's redundant, since you can always compute them from the variable, and it
makes the code that deals with actuals rather cleaner.
On the other hand, it slightly complicates some of the tests, because any names
you use in an Actual need to be defined...
Various infrastructure too to support these.
Doing A.ForEach raised an interesting question: what does it work over? In
plain occam it'd just be arrays, but it should obviously work for lists too.
This suggests that Size and Subscript should work on lists as well, since
ForEach will be implemented in terms of them. I've therefore introduced the
idea of a "sequence" class of types.
There's obviously some overlap with the Rain typechecker here. I've tried to
cover everything in the AST that could potentially be bound into occam at some
point in the future, even if the occam parser doesn't support it yet (so
this'll do checks for Concat and mobile allocation, for example).
