{- Tock: a compiler for parallel languages Copyright (C) 2007 University of Kent This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see . -} -- | Simplify communications. module SimplifyComms where import Control.Monad.State import Data.Generics import Data.List import qualified AST as A import CompState import Metadata import Pass import qualified Properties as Prop import Types import Utils simplifyComms :: [Pass] simplifyComms = makePassesDep [ ("Define temporary variables for outputting expressions", outExprs, Prop.agg_namesDone ++ Prop.agg_typesDone, [Prop.outExpressionRemoved]) ,("Transform ? CASE statements/guards into plain CASE", transformInputCase, Prop.agg_namesDone ++ Prop.agg_typesDone, [Prop.inputCaseRemoved]) ,("Flatten sequential protocol inputs into multiple inputs", transformProtocolInput, Prop.agg_namesDone ++ Prop.agg_typesDone ++ [Prop.inputCaseRemoved], [Prop.seqInputsFlattened]) ] outExprs :: Data t => t -> PassM t outExprs = doGeneric `extM` doProcess where doGeneric :: Data t => t -> PassM t doGeneric = makeGeneric outExprs doProcess :: A.Process -> PassM A.Process doProcess (A.Output m c ois) = do (ois', specs) <- mapAndUnzipM changeItem ois let foldedSpec = foldFuncs specs return $ A.Seq m (foldedSpec $ A.Only m $ A.Output m c ois') doProcess (A.OutputCase m c tag ois) = do (ois', specs) <- mapAndUnzipM changeItem ois let foldedSpec = foldFuncs specs return $ A.Seq m (foldedSpec $ A.Only m $ A.OutputCase m c tag ois') doProcess p = doGeneric p changeItem :: A.OutputItem -> PassM (A.OutputItem, A.Structured A.Process -> A.Structured A.Process) changeItem (A.OutExpression m e) = do (e', spec) <- transExpr m e return (A.OutExpression m e', spec) changeItem (A.OutCounted m ce ae) = do (ce', ceSpec) <- transExpr m ce (ae', aeSpec) <- transExpr m ae return (A.OutCounted m ce' ae', ceSpec . aeSpec) transExpr :: Meta -> A.Expression -> PassM (A.Expression, A.Structured A.Process -> A.Structured A.Process) -- If it's already an output direct from a variable, no need to change it: transExpr _ e@(A.ExprVariable {}) = return (e, id) transExpr m e = do (nm, spec) <- abbrevExpr m e return (A.ExprVariable m $ A.Variable m nm, spec) abbrevExpr :: Meta -> A.Expression -> PassM (A.Name, A.Structured A.Process -> A.Structured A.Process) abbrevExpr m e = do t <- typeOfExpression e specification@(A.Specification _ nm _) <- defineNonce m "output_var" (A.IsExpr m A.ValAbbrev t e) A.VariableName A.ValAbbrev return (nm, A.Spec m specification) {- The explanation for this pass is taken from my (Neil's) mailing list post "Case protocols" on tock-discuss, dated 10th October 2007: Currently in Tock (from occam) we have CASE statements, and inputs for variant protocols. They are parsed into separate AST entries, which is sensible. But then in the backend there is some duplicate code because both things get turned into some form of switch statement. It would be straightforward to unify the code in the C/C++ backends, but I was wondering about doing something which would be a bit cleaner; unifying them in an earlier pass (everything should be a pass in nanopass :). The idea would be to turn (example is from the occam 2 manual): from.dfs ? CASE record; rnumber; rlen::buffer -- process A error ; enumber; elen::buffer -- process B into: INT temp.var: SEQ from.dfs ? temp.var CASE temp.var 3 SEQ from.dfs ? rnumber ; rlen::buffer -- process A 4 SEQ from.dfs ? enumber ; elen::buffer -- process B Note that the tags are turned into integer literals, which is what happens in Tock already anyway. Note that in Tock each protocol item is already a separate communication, so splitting out the sequential inputs is fine. ALTs would have to be split as follows, by turning: ALT from.dfs ? CASE request ; query -- process C error ; enumber; elen::buffer -- process D into: ALT INT temp.var: from.dfs ? temp.var CASE temp.var 0 SEQ from.dfs ? query -- process C 1 SEQ from.dfs ? enumber ; elen::buffer -- process D -} transformInputCase :: Data t => t -> PassM t transformInputCase = doGeneric `extM` doProcess where doGeneric :: Data t => t -> PassM t doGeneric = makeGeneric transformInputCase doProcess :: A.Process -> PassM A.Process doProcess (A.Input m v (A.InputCase m' s)) = do spec@(A.Specification _ n _) <- defineNonce m "input_tag" (A.Declaration m' A.Int) A.VariableName A.Original s' <- doStructuredV v s return $ A.Seq m $ A.Spec m' spec $ A.Several m' [A.Only m $ A.Input m v (A.InputSimple m [A.InVariable m (A.Variable m n)]) ,A.Only m' $ A.Case m' (A.ExprVariable m $ A.Variable m n) s'] doProcess (A.Alt m pri s) = do s' <- doStructuredA s return (A.Alt m pri s') doProcess p = doGeneric p -- Can't easily use generics here as we're switching from one type of Structured to another doStructuredV :: A.Variable -> A.Structured A.Variant -> PassM (A.Structured A.Option) -- These entries all just burrow deeper into the structured: doStructuredV v (A.ProcThen m p s) = do s' <- doStructuredV v s p' <- doProcess p return (A.ProcThen m p' s') doStructuredV v (A.Spec m sp st) = do st' <- doStructuredV v st return (A.Spec m sp st') doStructuredV v (A.Several m ss) = do ss' <- mapM (doStructuredV v) ss return (A.Several m ss') doStructuredV v (A.Rep m rep s) = do s' <- doStructuredV v s return (A.Rep m rep s') -- Transform variant options: doStructuredV chanVar (A.Only m (A.Variant m' n iis p)) = do (Right items) <- protocolItems chanVar let (Just idx) = elemIndex n (fst $ unzip items) p' <- doProcess p return $ A.Only m $ A.Option m' [makeConstant m' idx] $ if (length iis == 0) then p' else A.Seq m' $ A.Several m' [A.Only m' $ A.Input m' chanVar (A.InputSimple m' iis) ,A.Only (findMeta p') p'] doStructuredA :: A.Structured A.Alternative -> PassM (A.Structured A.Alternative) -- TODO use generics instead of this boilerplate, but don't omit the doProcess call in ProcThen! doStructuredA (A.ProcThen m p s) = do s' <- doStructuredA s p' <- doProcess p return (A.ProcThen m p' s') doStructuredA (A.Spec m sp st) = do st' <- doStructuredA st return (A.Spec m sp st') doStructuredA (A.Several m ss) = do ss' <- mapM doStructuredA ss return (A.Several m ss') doStructuredA (A.Rep m rep s) = do s' <- doStructuredA s return (A.Rep m rep s') -- Transform alt guards: -- The processes that are the body of input-case guards are always skip, so we can discard them: doStructuredA (A.Only m (A.Alternative m' v (A.InputCase m'' s) _)) = do spec@(A.Specification _ n _) <- defineNonce m "input_tag" (A.Declaration m' A.Int) A.VariableName A.Original s' <- doStructuredV v s return $ A.Spec m' spec $ A.Only m $ A.Alternative m' v (A.InputSimple m [A.InVariable m (A.Variable m n)]) $ A.Case m'' (A.ExprVariable m'' $ A.Variable m n) s' doStructuredA (A.Only m (A.AlternativeCond m' e v (A.InputCase m'' s) _)) = do spec@(A.Specification _ n _) <- defineNonce m "input_tag" (A.Declaration m' A.Int) A.VariableName A.Original s' <- doStructuredV v s return $ A.Spec m' spec $ A.Only m $ A.AlternativeCond m' e v (A.InputSimple m [A.InVariable m (A.Variable m n)]) $ A.Case m'' (A.ExprVariable m'' $ A.Variable m n) s' -- Leave other guards (and parts of Structured) untouched: doStructuredA s = return s transformProtocolInput :: Data t => t -> PassM t transformProtocolInput = doGeneric `extM` doProcess `extM` doAlternative where doGeneric :: Data t => t -> PassM t doGeneric = makeGeneric transformProtocolInput doProcess :: A.Process -> PassM A.Process doProcess (A.Input m v (A.InputSimple m' iis@(_:_:_))) = return $ A.Seq m $ A.Several m $ map (A.Only m . A.Input m v . A.InputSimple m' . singleton) iis doProcess p = doGeneric p doAlternative :: A.Alternative -> PassM A.Alternative doAlternative (A.Alternative m v (A.InputSimple m' (firstII:(otherIIS@(_:_)))) body) = do body' <- doProcess body return $ A.Alternative m v (A.InputSimple m' [firstII]) $ A.Seq m' $ A.Several m' $ map (A.Only m' . A.Input m' v . A.InputSimple m' . singleton) otherIIS ++ [A.Only m' body'] doAlternative (A.AlternativeCond m cond v (A.InputSimple m' (firstII:(otherIIS@(_:_)))) body) = do body' <- doProcess body return $ A.AlternativeCond m cond v (A.InputSimple m' [firstII]) $ A.Seq m' $ A.Several m' $ map (A.Only m' . A.Input m' v . A.InputSimple m' . singleton) otherIIS ++ [A.Only m' body'] doAlternative s = doGeneric s