From 10b19b64b1d16f1f68e24f1863ce940080b46a09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sven Fuchs Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:34:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] why did we use the minispade string strategy for development? --- Assetfile | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Assetfile b/Assetfile index edb50985..c4c50a97 100644 --- a/Assetfile +++ b/Assetfile @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ input assets.scripts do match %r(^(?!vendor|spec).*\.js$) do modules = proc { |input| input.path.gsub(%r((^app/|lib/|\.js$)), '') } - minispade(string: assets.development?, rewrite_requires: true, module_id_generator: modules) + # why did we use the string strategy for development? makes it impossible to set breakpoints + # minispade(string: assets.development?, rewrite_requires: true, module_id_generator: modules) + minispade(string: false, rewrite_requires: true, module_id_generator: modules) end match %r(^(?!spec).*\.js$) do