![]() It seems that this is more reliable way to handle async waits. runs block is executed only when first waitFor succeeds and then it waits for next waitFor. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
specs | ||
application.js | ||
vendor.js |
![]() It seems that this is more reliable way to handle async waits. runs block is executed only when first waitFor succeeds and then it waits for next waitFor. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
specs | ||
application.js | ||
vendor.js |