restrict structural recursion

This commit is contained in:
Andrew Kent 2014-12-22 12:35:15 -05:00
parent 683ebb1023
commit 53d1d8a15d

View File

@ -2,36 +2,67 @@
(require "../utils/utils.rkt")
(require (rep type-rep)
(types union subtype remove-intersect resolve)
(types abbrev base-abbrev union subtype remove-intersect resolve)
"signatures.rkt"
racket/match)
racket/match
racket/set)
(import infer^)
(export restrict^)
;; we don't use union map directly, since that might produce too many elements
(define (union-map f l)
(match l
[(Union: es)
(let ([l (map f es)])
(apply Un l))]))
;; NEW IMPL
;; restrict t1 to be a subtype of t2
;; if `f' is 'new, use t2 when giving up, otherwise use t1
(define (restrict* t1 t2 [f 'new])
(cond
[(subtype t1 t2) t1] ;; already a subtype
[(match t2
[(Poly: vars t)
(and (infer vars null (list t1) (list t) #f) t1)]
[_ #f])]
[(Union? t1) (union-map (lambda (e) (restrict* e t2 f)) t1)]
[(Union? t2) (union-map (lambda (e) (restrict* t1 e f)) t2)]
[(needs-resolving? t1) (restrict* (resolve-once t1) t2 f)]
[(needs-resolving? t2) (restrict* t1 (resolve-once t2) f)]
[(subtype t2 t1) t2] ;; we don't actually want this - want something that's a part of t1
[(not (overlap t1 t2)) (Un)] ;; there's no overlap, so the restriction is empty
[else (if (eq? f 'new) t2 t1)])) ;; t2 and t1 have a complex relationship, so we punt
(define restrict restrict*)
;; if `pref' is 'new, use t2 when giving up, otherwise use t1
(define (restrict t1 t2 [pref 'new])
;; build-type: build a type while propogating bottom
(define (build-type constructor . args)
(if (memf Bottom? args) -Bottom (apply constructor args)))
;; resolved is a set tracking previously seen restrict cases
;; (i.e. pairs of t1 t2) to prevent infinite unfolding.
;; subtyping performs a similar check for the same
;; reason
(define (restrict* t1 t2 pref resolved)
(match* (t1 t2)
;; already a subtype
[(_ _) #:when (subtype t1 t2)
t1]
;; polymorphic restrict
[(_ (Poly: vars t)) #:when (infer vars null (list t1) (list t) #f)
t1]
;; structural recursion on types
[((Pair: a1 d1) (Pair: a2 d2))
(build-type -pair
(restrict* a1 a2 pref resolved)
(restrict* d1 d2 pref resolved))]
;; FIXME: support structural updating for structs when structs are updated to
;; contain not only *if* they are polymorphic, but *which* fields are too
;;[((Struct: _ _ _ _ _ _)
;; (Struct: _ _ _ _ _ _))]
[((Syntax: t1*) (Syntax: t2*))
(build-type -Syntax (restrict* t1* t2* pref resolved))]
[((Promise: t1*) (Promise: t2*))
(build-type -Promise (restrict* t1* t2* pref resolved))]
;; unions
[((Union: t1s) _) (apply Un (map (λ (t1*) (restrict* t1* t2 pref resolved)) t1s))]
[(_ (Union: t2s)) (apply Un (map (λ (t2*) (restrict* t1 t2* pref resolved)) t2s))]
;; resolve resolvable types if we haven't already done so
[((? needs-resolving?) _) #:when (not (set-member? resolved (cons t1 t2)))
(restrict* (resolve-once t1) t2 pref (set-add resolved (cons t1 t2)))]
[(_ (? needs-resolving?)) #:when (not (set-member? resolved (cons t1 t2)))
(restrict* t1 (resolve-once t2) pref (set-add resolved (cons t1 t2)))]
;; we don't actually want this - want something that's a part of t1
[(_ _) #:when (subtype t2 t1)
t2]
;; there's no overlap, so the restriction is empty
[(_ _) #:when (not (overlap t1 t2))
(Un)]
;; t2 and t1 have a complex relationship, so we punt
[(_ _) (if (eq? pref 'new) t2 t1)]))
(restrict* t1 t2 pref (set)))