Before this, row instantiation was done with an ad-hoc
and undocumented syntax. Adding a new form works better
because rows should not be parsed as types.
This fills the corresponding entries in the cast table with a Dead-Code
type so that when the contract-generation pass calls the contract-def
thunk, it finds that in the table.
* call compute-constraints instead of sc->constraints in get-max-contract-kind
* test cast on an intersection type involving Rec
* remove memory limit on sandboxed-unsafe-ops test
Avoids using mzlib/pconvert in favor of a few big match
clauses. This lets us cut out a package dependency and
makes the code easier to understand.
This commit also removes the use of mzlib/pconvert
in the debug printer in favor of just using the type
serialization performed in init-envs.rkt.
In addition, a few optimizations for type serialization
were implemented that cut a few percent off of zo sizes.
Note that this commit regresses for zo sizes for modules
that heavily use GUI classes, but that is fixed in a
future commit.
Correctly restrict the struct predicate's filter type when
a parent struct is mutable but the child is not and they both
have polymorphic type variables.
See the discussion in GH issue #205
since 'restrict' will now create intersections when there is
a complex relationship between the two types, calling it
'intersect' makes a lot more sense.
Adds intersection types as a better way to handle the the case
when restrict cannot structurally intersect two types (e.g. when
you learn within a polymorphic function a variable x of type A
is also an Integer, but we dont know how A relates to Integer).
This allows for non-lossy refinements of type info while typechecking.
This pull request is largely a renaming effort to clean up the TR codebase. There are two primary things I wanted to change:
1. Replace all occurrences of "filter" with "prop" or "proposition"
- The word "filter" is a meaningless opaque term at this point in the Typed Racket implementation. If anything, it just adds confusion to why things are the way the are. We should use "proposition" instead, since that's what they actually are.
2. Avoid using "Top" and "Bottom" in both the type and proposition realm.
- Currently the top type is called Univ and the bottom type is called bottom, while the top proposition is called Top and the bottom proposition is called Bot. This is just unnecessarily confusing, doesn't really line up w/ the user-space names, and doesn't line up with the names we use in TR formalisms. Worse, all of the top types of primitive types---e.g. the type of all structs, StructTop--- use Top, so it is really easy to get confused about what name to use for these sorts of things.
With these issues in mind, I made the following changes to names:
Top -> TrueProp
Bot -> FalseProp
TypeFilter -> TypeProp
NotTypeFilter -> NotTypeProp
AndFilter -> AndProp
OrFilter -> OrProp
-filter t o -> -is-type o t
-not-filter t o -> -not-type o t
FilterSet -> PropSet
NoFilter -> #f
NoObject -> #f
-FS -> -PS
-top -> -tt
-bot -> -ff
implied-atomic? q p -> implies-atomic? p q
filter-rec-id -> prop-rec-id
-no-filter -> -no-propset
-top-filter -> -tt-propset
-bot-filter -> -ff-propset
-true-filter -> -true-propset
-false-filter -> -false-propset
PredicateFilter: -> PredicateProp:
add-unconditional-filter-all-args add-unconditional-prop-all-args
* Fix type of syntax->list
to return `(U False (Listof (Syntaxof Any)))` if it can't prove that the input is a syntax-list.
Fixes https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/347
This makes the type `syntax->list` consistent with the type `stx->list` already has.
* Add tests for syntax->list
