Since these promises re-evaluate their bodies every time they
are forced, allowing them makes `force` not idempotent and not
safe to treat as a path.
This change is slightly backwards-incompatible, since programs
that previously passed `delay/name` promises across the typed
boundary will now fail at runtime. The alternative is also
incompatible: stop treating `force` as a path. Since `delay/name`
is quite obscure, this approach seems like the safer choice.
This enables contract generation in the negative
direction (untyped->typed) for row polymorphic types
(basically mixin types).
Depends on `class-seal` and `class-unseal` in
the racket/class library.
