since 'restrict' will now create intersections when there is
a complex relationship between the two types, calling it
'intersect' makes a lot more sense.
This pull request is largely a renaming effort to clean up the TR codebase. There are two primary things I wanted to change:
1. Replace all occurrences of "filter" with "prop" or "proposition"
- The word "filter" is a meaningless opaque term at this point in the Typed Racket implementation. If anything, it just adds confusion to why things are the way the are. We should use "proposition" instead, since that's what they actually are.
2. Avoid using "Top" and "Bottom" in both the type and proposition realm.
- Currently the top type is called Univ and the bottom type is called bottom, while the top proposition is called Top and the bottom proposition is called Bot. This is just unnecessarily confusing, doesn't really line up w/ the user-space names, and doesn't line up with the names we use in TR formalisms. Worse, all of the top types of primitive types---e.g. the type of all structs, StructTop--- use Top, so it is really easy to get confused about what name to use for these sorts of things.
With these issues in mind, I made the following changes to names:
Top -> TrueProp
Bot -> FalseProp
TypeFilter -> TypeProp
NotTypeFilter -> NotTypeProp
AndFilter -> AndProp
OrFilter -> OrProp
-filter t o -> -is-type o t
-not-filter t o -> -not-type o t
FilterSet -> PropSet
NoFilter -> #f
NoObject -> #f
-FS -> -PS
-top -> -tt
-bot -> -ff
implied-atomic? q p -> implies-atomic? p q
filter-rec-id -> prop-rec-id
-no-filter -> -no-propset
-top-filter -> -tt-propset
-bot-filter -> -ff-propset
-true-filter -> -true-propset
-false-filter -> -false-propset
PredicateFilter: -> PredicateProp:
add-unconditional-filter-all-args add-unconditional-prop-all-args
* Fix type of syntax->list
to return `(U False (Listof (Syntaxof Any)))` if it can't prove that the input is a syntax-list.
Fixes https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/347
This makes the type `syntax->list` consistent with the type `stx->list` already has.
* Add tests for syntax->list
Only parse and use the type annotations if they are present on
all fold variables. This matches the default for other forms in TR.
Also, this will usually result in a "insufficient type information"
message which is more helpful than if TR chose some default type.
Closes PR 15138
Closes PR 14893
The `identifier-binding` function is now senstive to the "macro
introduction" scope that's on an indentifier provided to a currently
expanding macro. Unit tests for TR need to use
`syntax-local-intorduce` to remove it, in the same way that `tc-setup`
already does.
Also, recognize a class expansion when it's wrapped with
`#%expression`, since `class` now expands that way sometimes.
