Alex Knauth 4465273da2 Should TR optimizer docs recommend real->double-flonum (#498) ... instead of exact->inexact? Since its usage in the guide is to create a value of type Float on which TR can apply optimizations, real->double-flonum seems like the the better choice. The type of exact->inexact can sometimes produce single flonums or complex numbers, but real->double-flonum always returns a Float. For converting exact complex numbers into inexact complex numbers I don't see another option; I'm not sure what to do there.		2017-10-01 17:36:23 -04:00
..
source-syntax	doc: move source-syntax docs to typed-racket-doc package	2017-09-06 11:15:10 -04:00
typed-racket	Should TR optimizer docs recommend real->double-flonum (#498)	2017-10-01 17:36:23 -04:00
info.rkt	Use new DrRacket opt-in buttons for OC.	2017-03-09 17:12:49 -06:00
LICENSE.txt	Remove extra directories.	2014-12-02 00:53:36 -05:00