typed-racket/collects/typed-scheme/main.rkt
Sam Tobin-Hochstadt eacda65291 Add `defined?' assertions to fix DrRacket.
original commit: e70ccafd7b591df218a1ae036f599c671eb57824
2010-12-08 18:53:56 -05:00

18 lines
640 B
Racket

#lang s-exp "minimal.rkt"
(providing (libs (except scheme/base #%module-begin #%top-interaction with-handlers lambda #%app for for*)
(except "private/prims.rkt")
(except "private/base-types.rkt")
(except "private/base-types-extra.rkt"))
(basics #%module-begin
#%top-interaction
lambda
#%app))
(require "private/extra-procs.rkt"
(for-syntax "private/base-types-extra.rkt"))
(provide (rename-out [with-handlers: with-handlers])
(for-syntax (all-from-out "private/base-types-extra.rkt"))
assert defined? with-type for for*)