find-relative-path expects a simple-form-path, but according to the documentation PLTUSERHOME as propagated by find-user-pkgs-dir must only be a complete-path?
Without this building of the documentation fails if PLTUSERHOME contains ".."
If module M in package P imports module N from package Q,
and if N has a `lazy-require` for a module in R that is
triggered during the compilation of M, then P doesn't really
depend on R; P depends on Q, and Q depends on R, and P
shoudn't necessarily know anything about Q. At the same time,
a change to the file in R means that M must be recompiled.
So, continue to track the compilation dependency, but mark
it as "indirect" so that the package-dependency checker can
ignore the dependency.
If the slow path has to be taken because the number of
list elements is greater than the stack size, then the
old implementation would copy all the arguments --- which
still might be too much for the available stack space.
Avoid that copy.
Also, add pad word to the end of the stack to help detect
overflow.
Not really sure about this one. The API kind of
forces my hand here and the way this works limits
the non-dep side of the dependent pair to always
be drawn from a fixed set. Not sure if that matters
in practice or not.
The `as-is` target is like the default target, but it skips package
update and installation, so it's suitable for rebuilding after local
changes that might include changes to the core.
For example, reduce (begin x (error 'e) y) ==> (begin x (error 'e)) and
(f (error 'e) y ) ==> (begin f (error 'e)).
Also, reduce (if (error 'e) x y) ==> (error 'e) and propagate the type information
and clocks when only one branch produce an error.
If the clone directory's checkout includes a target commit, then
use the clone directory directly for staging (i.e., for checking
dependencies and collisions). That way, changes made locally are
used for metadata checks.
before this commit it would copy them only when the weren't
already impersonated/chaperoned, leading to different
contract checking that can be confusing in that case
it did this because the chaperone-of? check wasn't general
enough to cope with copying always, but since commit
b05d07ad10 it now is
