TR sometimes inlines contracts instead of defining them
separately in order to cooperate with the contract system's
optimizations. In some cases, this caused TR to compile
duplicated contract definitions. This commit eliminates
this inefficiency.
* Give correct type to `in-port` when used with custom reader.
Currently, `in-port` returns `(Sequenceof Any)` unconditionally,
which is correct if the given read function is `read` (default
value). However, `(in-port read-line)`, `(in-port read-char)`,
etc. should have more specific types.
* For `in-port`, strip out EOF from the sequence type.
Correctly restrict the struct predicate's filter type when
a parent struct is mutable but the child is not and they both
have polymorphic type variables.
See the discussion in GH issue #205
since 'restrict' will now create intersections when there is
a complex relationship between the two types, calling it
'intersect' makes a lot more sense.
Adds intersection types as a better way to handle the the case
when restrict cannot structurally intersect two types (e.g. when
you learn within a polymorphic function a variable x of type A
is also an Integer, but we dont know how A relates to Integer).
This allows for non-lossy refinements of type info while typechecking.
This reverts commit 3f889bcf8c.
Unfortunately, this change is not backwards compatible, as seen in
both DrDr failures and errors reported by Ben Greenman.
This pull request is largely a renaming effort to clean up the TR codebase. There are two primary things I wanted to change:
1. Replace all occurrences of "filter" with "prop" or "proposition"
- The word "filter" is a meaningless opaque term at this point in the Typed Racket implementation. If anything, it just adds confusion to why things are the way the are. We should use "proposition" instead, since that's what they actually are.
2. Avoid using "Top" and "Bottom" in both the type and proposition realm.
- Currently the top type is called Univ and the bottom type is called bottom, while the top proposition is called Top and the bottom proposition is called Bot. This is just unnecessarily confusing, doesn't really line up w/ the user-space names, and doesn't line up with the names we use in TR formalisms. Worse, all of the top types of primitive types---e.g. the type of all structs, StructTop--- use Top, so it is really easy to get confused about what name to use for these sorts of things.
With these issues in mind, I made the following changes to names:
Top -> TrueProp
Bot -> FalseProp
TypeFilter -> TypeProp
NotTypeFilter -> NotTypeProp
AndFilter -> AndProp
OrFilter -> OrProp
-filter t o -> -is-type o t
-not-filter t o -> -not-type o t
FilterSet -> PropSet
NoFilter -> #f
NoObject -> #f
-FS -> -PS
-top -> -tt
-bot -> -ff
implied-atomic? q p -> implies-atomic? p q
filter-rec-id -> prop-rec-id
-no-filter -> -no-propset
-top-filter -> -tt-propset
-bot-filter -> -ff-propset
-true-filter -> -true-propset
-false-filter -> -false-propset
PredicateFilter: -> PredicateProp:
add-unconditional-filter-all-args add-unconditional-prop-all-args
* Fix type of syntax->list
to return `(U False (Listof (Syntaxof Any)))` if it can't prove that the input is a syntax-list.
Fixes https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/347
This makes the type `syntax->list` consistent with the type `stx->list` already has.
* Add tests for syntax->list
